Ogeon commented Mar 31, 2016 @Ogeon As I should have done, I've added a test in the server tests for that exact instance, and I can now say it is fixed. Browse other questions tagged sockets tcp or ask your own question. And I meant also that it's not hard for a callback API, or Futures, or whatever to be built on top. A non-null local socket address parameter can be used to bind the socket to a specific local address. check over here
Anyway according to quick test a hello world example configured for 1M connections takes about 350M RSS (379M of virtual memory, in case you doubt that something is non-initialized yet). It should be noted that section 126.96.36.199 of the HTTP 1.1 specification also requires that If the server chooses to close the connection immediately after sending the response, it SHOULD send a Connection header including the connection-token close. tailhook commented Jan 3, 2016 Okay here is the third article, including some benchmark vs golang, nginx and hyper. They want as little memory usage as possible for every connection, so that means controlling every allocation, including buffers used to read and write. https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/27426046/Sendmail-issue-collect-premature-EOM-collect-I-O-error-on-connection.html
The size is either smaller than 2 bytes or does not match the message length header field. HttpAsyncRequestConsumer implementations are expected to be thread-safe. requestReceived: Triggered when a new HTTP request is received.
Real Expires: headers usually lie and a Last-Modified: header is necessarily stale if the response is stale so both cannot be trusted. Is it generally accepted strategy? Max entity length: unlimited. Ogeon commented Apr 1, 2016 Ok, I found something.
Mio Running 30s test @ http://127.0.0.1:1337/ 10 threads and 1000 connections Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev Latency 22.23ms 34.30ms 1.03s 99.67% Req/Sec 4.76k 693.41 8.08k 88.07% 1421686 requests in 30.06s, 122.02MB read Requests/sec: 47290.16 Transfer/sec: 4.06MB wrk -c 1000 -t 10 -d 30s "http://127.0.0.1:1337/" 2.80s user 11.56s system 47% cpu 30.111 total Master Running 30s test @ http://127.0.0.1:1337/ 10 threads and 1000 connections Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev Latency 54.80us 93.95us 22.16ms 98.91% Req/Sec 84.24k 15.81k 97.11k 78.33% 2512893 requests in 30.07s, 215.68MB read Requests/sec: 83560.27 Transfer/sec: 7.17MB wrk -c 1000 -t 10 -d 30s "http://127.0.0.1:1337/" 5.07s user 22.54s system 91% cpu 30.122 total Can anyone else confirm this? Code is a slight mess because it is the first pass at this to make it work. Non-blocking HTTP connections are stateful and not thread-safe. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13182519/spring-rest-template-usage-causes-eofexception When the underlying I/O session is input ready, the I/O dispatcher should check whether the SSL I/O session is ready to produce input data by calling SSLIOSession#isAppInputReady(), pass control to the protocol handler if it is, and finally call SSLIOSession#inboundTransport() method in order to do the necessary SSL handshaking and decrypt input data.
The latter, I haven't seen in a long time. Is it because of inlining, or because of the different structure of the code? hyperium member seanmonstar commented Sep 11, 2015 @Ogeon I'm sure you will (bump into problems). :) tailhook commented Sep 14, 2015 @seanmonstar, few questions: From quick skimming, it looks like you made the mio-only version, rather than making mio support optional, right? But it's not the FIN-ACK expected of the truly polite TCP/IP converseur.
My concern is that network latency or packet loss could be causing you to exceed the max time allotted possibly on the sending side. One of the things I noticed was that server cannot utilize more than one cpu core now. All ``304 Not modified'' Polygraph responses do not. I'll think more on the relationship between the 2nd and 3rd crates.
That is why Polygraph cannot give you an exact progress indication or ETA. jdm commented Jul 27, 2015 Servo would be super interested in hyper + mio to reduce the thread bloat :) gobwas commented Jul 27, 2015 hyper + mio looks very promising =) 👍 bfrog commented Jul 27, 2015 I would assume there would be some number of threads with event loops handling http requests rather than one thread with one event loop? His open source projects include the XOM Library for processing XML with Java and the Amateur media player. Πληροφορίες βιβλιογραφίαςΤίτλοςJava I/OΣυγγραφέαςElliotte Rusty HaroldΈκδοση2Εκδότης"O'Reilly Media, Inc.", 2006ISBN1449390889, 9781449390884Μέγεθος728 σελίδες  Εξαγωγή αναφοράςBiBTeXEndNoteRefManΣχετικά με τα Βιβλία Google - Πολιτική Απορρήτου - ΌροιΠαροχήςΥπηρεσιών - Πληροφορίες για Εκδότες - Αναφορά προβλήματος - Βοήθεια - Χάρτης ιστότοπου - GoogleΑρχική σελίδα Chapter3.Asynchronous I/O based on NIOPrevNextChapter3.Asynchronous I/O based on NIO Asynchronous I/O model may be more appropriate for those scenarios where raw data throughput is less important than the ability to handle thousands of simultaneous connections in a scalable, resource efficient manner. The biggest question on mio right now is how to make things composable.
At the time of writing, only IP addresses are recognized and FQDNs are not supported. Not the answer you're looking for? Get 1:1 Help Now Advertise Here Enjoyed your answer? this content The first item is basically ok, except maybe put types into separate crates.
I've been doing all this work on nightly, and that syntax is allowed on nightly, but not stable yet. Please note that this consumer buffers response content in memory and therefore should be used for relatively small response messages. 3.9.Non-blocking connection pools Non-blocking connection pools are quite similar to blocking one with one significant distinction that they have to reply an I/O reactor to establish new connections. I assume this is because of mio.
You can change the passphrase with the attribute "secrets" in Mojolicious. This can happen, for example, when a chunked encoding is missing a mandatory delimiter, and the parser keeps waiting for them until the buffer gets full. error(errForeignRep): ``foreign reply'' A "foreign reply" error indicates that a Polygraph client has received a reply that does not look like anything a Polygraph server (or a proxy on behalf of a server) would produce. Otherwise, the user won't be able to use whatever event notification mechanism they want.
AFAICS in rotor-http there are no heap-allocated stuff per state machine, except buffers. Thanks for the update, and all the hard work! The I/O reactor will record all exceptions thrown during the shutdown process, including the original one that actually caused the shutdown in the first place, in an audit log. sendmail: i32MnNQ4001027: collect: premature EOM: Connection reset by host.domain.net sendmail: i32MnNQ4001027: SYSERR(root): collect: I/O error on connection from host.domain.net, from=
The HTTP response is chunked and the server closes the connection in the middle of a chunk or before the final (empty) chunk has been sent.